Blending Visual Humor and Sermon Audio: TikTok Da’wah Strategies for Generation Z
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52833/masjiduna.v9i1.309Keywords:
Dakwah digital, , Generasi Z, Humor religius, , Netnografi, TikTokAbstract
A growing number of Islamic content creators on TikTok now separate two message channels within a single video: the visual channel carries entertainment material such as comedy clips, memes, gameplay recordings, or aesthetic footage, while the audio channel carries excerpts of religious sermons. This hybrid format remains understudied because the existing literature on digital da’wah generally examines preachers who themselves perform humorously, rather than the detachment of humor from the religious source. This study aims to map the typology of visual–audio pairings in TikTok da’wah content, to explain how visual humor lowers the psychological resistance of Generation Z audiences, and to identify the risk of decontextualizing sermon excerpts. The study employs a descriptive qualitative approach using the netnographic method. Data were collected through non-participant observation of 570 videos from four Indonesian-language TikTok da’wah accounts between January and April 2026, supplemented by public metrics and audience comments, and analyzed through data condensation, data display, and conclusion verification. The findings identify four types of visual–audio pairing: consolation–admonition, absurd–reflective, gameplay–narrative, and aesthetic–devotional, distributed very unevenly across the corpus: gameplay–narrative accounts for 87.72 percent (500 videos), consolation–admonition together with its absurd–reflective variant for 7.02 percent (40 videos), and aesthetic–devotional for 5.26 percent (30 videos). Visual humor operates through the peripheral route: it diverts the cognitive resources ordinarily used to construct counterarguments while generating positive affect that eases message acceptance. This effect, however, is stronger for recall than for attitude change, so claims about the effectiveness of the format should be stated proportionally. The study further finds a decontextualization risk when sermons are cut into 20–40 second fragments stripped of conditions, context, and attribution; 82 percent of the corpus identifies the preacher in no form whatsoever. It concludes that the two-channel format is an effective rhetorical strategy for breaching scroll culture, yet demands citation ethics and adequate Islamic literacy from creators.
Downloads
References
Aini, N. (2023). Pemanfaatan media dakwah platform digital di era Generasi Z. CBJIS: Cross-Border Journal of Islamic Studies, 5(2), 109–116.
Barta, S., Belanche, D., Fernández, A., & Flavián, M. (2023). Influencer marketing on TikTok: The effectiveness of humor and followers’ hedonic experience. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 70, 103149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103149
Bucher, T. (2017). The algorithmic imaginary: Exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086
Budiantoro, W. (2018). Dakwah di era digital. Komunika: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi, 11(2), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v11i2.1369
Bunt, G. R. (2018). Hashtag Islam: How cyber-Islamic environments are transforming religious authority. UNC Press Books.
Campbell, H. A. (Editor). (2013). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds. Routledge.
Campbell, H. A., & Bellar, W. (2023). Digital religion: The basics. Routledge.
Carcioppolo, N., Wang, G., Yuan, K., Yang, Z., & Wang, D. (2025). When humor appeals fail and when they succeed: Using latent profile analysis to identify audience receptivity to humorous messages. Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502251405335
Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
Eickelman, D. F., & Anderson, J. W. (Editors). (2003). New media in the Muslim world: The emerging public sphere (2nd ed.). Indiana University Press.
Eisend, M. (2009). A meta-analysis of humor in advertising. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-008-0096-y
Evolvi, G. (2021). Religion and the internet: Digital religion, (hyper)mediated spaces, and materiality. Zeitschrift Für Religion, Gesellschaft Und Politik. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41682-021-00087-9
Famuji, U., Irhamsyah, F., Badriyah, N., Nik Abdul Majid, N. S., & Muthoharoh, I. (2026). Reconstructing digital da’wah paradigm: Restoring da’i authority through Islamic humanism in the artificial intelligence era. Palakka: Media and Islamic Communication, 7(1), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.30863/palakka.v7i1.11674
Famuji, U., Kholis, N., Basit, A., & Ahmed, A. M. (2025). Click, share, da’wah: Spiritual revolution at your fingertips. Lentera: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 9.
Fata, A. K. (2024). Dari ulama ke internet: Transformasi dakwah di zaman kiwari. Farabi, 21(2), 97–113.
Hasanah, H. (2017). Teknik-teknik observasi: Sebuah alternatif metode pengumpulan data kualitatif ilmu-ilmu sosial. At-Taqaddum, 8(1), 21–46.
Hjarvard, S. (2011). The mediatisation of religion: Theorising religion, media and social change. Culture and Religion, 12(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2011.579719
Husein, F., & Slama, M. (2018). Online piety and its discontent: Revisiting Islamic anxieties on Indonesian social media. Indonesia and the Malay World, 46(134), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2018.1415056
Kemp, S. (2026). Digital 2026: Indonesia. DataReportal. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2026-indonesia
Kozinets, R. V. (2020). Netnography: The essential guide to qualitative social media research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
Kusumawati, J., & Sitika, A. J. (2024). Pemanfaatan aplikasi TikTok sebagai media dakwah Islam bagi generasi “Z.” Al-Ulum: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Keislaman, 11(3), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.31102/alulum.11.3.2024.271-283
Lövheim, M. (2011). Mediatisation of religion: A critical appraisal. Culture and Religion, 12(2), 153–166.
Maharani, A., Suryana, A., & Wirakusumah, T. K. (2024). Strategi pengelolaan akun TikTok edukatif. Tuturan: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Sosial dan Humaniora, 2(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.47861/tuturan.v2i2.924
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Mutrofin. (2023). Urgensi peningkatan kualitas literasi keislaman melalui digitalisasi: Studi pada followers TikTok da’i muda Husain Basyaiban. Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi, 8(1), 45–66.
Nisa, E. F. (2018). Creative and lucrative daʿwa: The visual culture of Instagram amongst female Muslim youth in Indonesia. Asiascape: Digital Asia, 5(1–2), 68–99. https://doi.org/10.1163/22142312-12340085
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.
Parhan, M., Rahmawati, Y., Rahmawati, I. R., Rastiadi, H. A., & Maysaroh, M. (2022). Analisis metode dan konten dakwah yang diminati pada remaja. Anida (Aktualisasi Nuansa Ilmu Dakwah), 22(1), 65–75.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer-Verlag.
Rakatiwi, Y., Halwati, U., & Nawawi, N. (2023). FYP dakwah digital creator milenial melalui TikTok di era 5.0. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan, 17(3), 1583–1592.
Setiawan, E., & Mulyono, B. (2024). Peran literasi digital dalam meningkatkan etika penggunaan media sosial TikTok pada peserta didik SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Salam. Jurnal Kajian Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 13(5), 530–539.
Strick, M., Holland, R. W., van Baaren, R. B., & van Knippenberg, A. (2012). Those who laugh are defenseless: How humor breaks resistance to influence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(2), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028534
Suprima, S., Parhan, M., Khairulimam, A., Nurfitriyani, M., & Ababil, S. N. (2021). Dakwah di masa pandemi Covid-19: Eksistensi, problematika, serta solusi. Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 41(1), 85–96.
Turner, B. S. (2007). Religious authority and the new media. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407075001
Walter, N., Cody, M. J., Xu, L. Z., & Murphy, S. T. (2018). A priest, a rabbi, and a minister walk into a bar: A meta-analysis of humor effects on persuasion. Human Communication Research, 44(4), 343–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqy005
Weinberger, M. G., & Gulas, C. S. (2019). The emergence of a half-century of research on humour in advertising: What have we learned? What do we still need to learn? International Journal of Advertising, 38(7), 911–956.
Zaid, B., Fedtke, J., Shin, D. D., El Kadoussi, A., & Ibahrine, M. (2022). Digital Islam and Muslim millennials: How social media influencers reimagine religious authority and Islamic practices. Religions, 13(4), 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13040335
Zulli, D., & Zulli, D. J. (2022). Extending the internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society, 24(8), 1872–1890. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820983603
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Untung Famuji, Aris Munandar , Desnas Artanti; Nida Nadia Zakiyatunnisa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





